Miyerkules, Pebrero 5, 2014

HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF LINGUISTICS

HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF LINGUISTICS





While ancient India and Greece had a remarkable grammatical tradition, throughout most of history, linguistics had been the province of PHILOSOPHY, RHETORIC, and LITERARY.
In 1786, there are regular sound correspondences among many of the languages spoken in Europe, India, and Persia. For example, the English ‘f’ sound often corresponds to a ‘p’ sound in, among others, Latin and Sanskrit, an important ancient language of India.
English, Latin and Sanskrit
Scholars realized that these correspondences – found in thousands of words- could not be due to chance or to mutual influence. The only reliable conclusion was that these languages are related to one another because they come from a common ancestor.
Much of the 19th century linguistics was devoted to working out the nature of this parent language, spoken about 6,000 years ago, as Russian, Hindi, and its other modern descendants.
The Study of Language Structure
At the beginning of the 20th Century, attention shifted to the fact that not only language change, but language structure as well, is systematic and governed by regular rules and principles. 
The attention of the world’s linguists turned more and more to the study of grammar- in the technical sense of the term the organization of the sound system of a language and the internal structure of its words and sentences.
This period also saw an intensified scholarly study of languages that had never been written down. It had by then become commonplace, for example, for an American linguist to spend several years working out the intricacies of the grammars of Chippewa, Ojibwa, Apache, Mohawk, or some other indigenous language of North America.
Language Use: Study of Language
There is also a long tradition in the study of what a word or sentence ‘means’ a particular thing and how these meanings go back to the ancient Greeks:
§   One is that meanings are mental representations of some sort; another is that the meaning of an expression is purely a function of how it is used. Both ideas have launched research programs that are active today.
       They have been joined by a third approach, building on work by philosophers such as Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell, which applies formal methods derived from logic and attempts to equate the meaning of an expression with reference and the conditions under which it might be judged to be true or false.


THE ORIGIN OF MODERN LINGUISTICS


Language Uses:
·          Studies of Meaning
·          The Social Studies of Meaning
Language Use:
The Social Side of Language
Ø  In the past 50 years
-       Increasing attention to the social side of language as well as the mental.
The national liberation movements active in third world countries after the war posed the question of what would be their official language(s) after independence, a pressing question, since almost all of them are multilingual.
This led to scholarly study of the language situation in the countries of the world.
In addition, the movements for minority rights in the United States and other Western countries have led to a close examination of social variation that complements earlier work in geographical variation.


Scholars have turned the analytical tools of linguistics to the study of nonstandard varieties like African American Vernacular English and Chicano Spanish. And the women’s movement has led many linguists to investigate gender differences in speech and whether our language has to perpetuate sexual inequality.
Linguistics- as a study endeavors to describe and explain the human faculty of language.
In ancient civilization, linguistic study was originally motivated by the correct description of classical liturgical language, notably that of Sanskrit grammar by Panini (fl, 4th Century BCE) Tolkappiyam in Tamil, or by the development of logic and rhetoric among Greeks.
Beginning around the 4th Century BCE, China also developed its own grammatical traditions and Arabic grammar and Hebrew grammar developed during the Middle Ages.
Modern linguistics began to develop in the 18th Century, reaching the “golden age of philology” in the 19th Century.


Contents


o    1 Antiquity
o    1.1 India
o    1.2 Greece
o    1.3 Rome
o    1.4 China
o    2 Middle Ages
o    2.1 Middle East
o    2.2 Europe
o    3 Modern Linguistics
o    3.1 Historical Linguistics
o    3.2 Descriptive Linguistics
o    3.3 Generative Linguistics
o    3.4 Other Subfields





Modern Linguistics
Modern linguistics does not begin until the late 18th century, and the romantic or animist theses of Johann Gottfried Herder and Johann Christoph Adelung remained influential well into the 19th century.


THE INFLUENCE OF LINGUISTICS


Linguistics is not a teaching technique. It is not a method of beginning reading instruction; neither is it a panacea for eliminating most of the reading problems.
Administrators, supervisors, and classroom teachers need to understand both the essential of linguistics as a discipline and the implications of these principles to the teaching and learning of reading and all the other language skills.
Many Aspects of Language
Linguistics is the scientific study of many aspects of language. Each part of the study is worthy of serious, independent consideration: descriptive, comparative, and historical linguistics; transformational and generative grammar and tagmemic analysis; and the study of phonology, morphology, dialectology, and lexicography.
Comprehending the vital role of meaning which is carried by the suprasegmental features of stress, pitch, juncture in oral language, we recognize the lack of punctuation, capitalization, or other devices in the written language to carry this full meaning.
Natural Patterns
            The study of Linguistics has many implications in understanding the process of how meaning can be derived from printed symbols, when it is clearly understood that those symbols are a secondary representation of speech.
                A child who reads a sentence like, “The heavy spring rains made the ball park a mass of oozy, sticky mud”, with a heavy stress on each word is not getting a proper feel for his language and the groupings of its words into structures of meanings. The teacher might help the pupil to “hear” reading which follows the rhythm and flow and pauses of oral English intonation by having him listen to sentences read easily and naturally and then having him imitate the pattern he hears.
                While it is necessary during the skill development portion of the reading lesson to study, analyze, discuss and relate new words to other words, the teachers should realize that words in isolation always carry primary stress. Linguistics has focused our attention on many different ways words enter a language.
Economy in Learning
When the meaning of a new word is developed, considerable learning time could be saved if the word if the word and its various forms were related and taught together. A suffix can change the part of speech or form class to which a word may be assigned, thus enabling a single word function in more than a single position or form class.
The area of dialectology has been overlooked in the elementary school, but as teachers gain an understanding of the variations in language- variations in pronunciation, in vocabulary, and in grammatical structure- they can help students to bridge the gap from their own dialect to that of the printed page as well as to that of characters in stories and books the children are reading. Through the study of dialect and its insights into the way our language actually functions, more effective teaching can be done in teaching acceptable usage.
Dialect and Usage
As we become aware of the role of dialect and usage we gain a new insight into the place, function, and design of the dictionary. The information we teach about words and the dictionary should be accurate and in accordance with the principles of lexicography. When we really understand the impact of the profound statement that dictionaries are descriptive and not prescriptive, we change our approach to dictionary study and even simple glossary activities become more realistic and significant.
      Recently, Andrew Schiller, writing in Harper’s Magazine on English instruction, states that the old will be eventually be supplanted by the new; and although the tools have been given us in structural linguistics, it is necessary for us to learn to use them.



BIG NAMES IN LINGUISTICS WITH THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS


Aristotle
Ø  He developed a system of categories that continues to influence the way linguists approach the question of how language carries meaning.
Panini
Ø  Famous for developing the first comprehensive and scientific theory of grammar.
Ø  His Sanskrit grammar is the first known attempt to provide a complete description of a language.

Plato
Ø  He presents the naturalistic view that word meanings emerge from a natural process, independent of the language user.
Ø  His arguments are partly based on examples of compounding, where the meaning of the whole is usually related to the constituents.

Leonard Bloomfield
Ø  An American linguist who led the development of structural linguistics in the United States during the 1930s and the 1940s.
Ø  His influential textbook Language, published in 1933, presented a comprehensive description of American structural linguistics.
Ø  He made significant contributions to Indo-European historical linguistics, the description of Austronesian languages, and description of languages of the Algonquian family

Charles J. Fillmore
Ø  He has been extremely influential in the areas of syntax and lexical semantics.
Ø  His seminal article The positioning of embedding transformations in a Grammar introduced the transformational cycle, which has been a foundational insight for theories of syntax since that time.
Ø  He was one of the founders of cognitive linguistics, and developed the theories of Case Grammar (Fillmore 1968), and Frame Semantics (1976).

Michael Halliday
Ø  A British-born Australian linguist who developed the internationally influential systemic functional linguistic model of language.
Ø  His grammatical descriptions go by the name of systemic functional grammar (SFG)
Ø  Describes language as a semiotic system, “not in the sense of a system of signs but a systematic resource for meaning.”

Robert Lado
Ø  Predict and describe the patterns that will cause difficulty in Learning ESL and those that will not cause difficulty by comparing systematically the language and culture to be learned with the native language and culture of the student.
Contrastive Hypothesis
                   associated with 2 branches:
1.)    Psycholinguistics
2.)    Contrastive Linguistics

Ferdinand de Saussure
  One of his translators Roy Harris summarized his contribution as:
 “Language is no longer regarded as peripheral to our grasp of the world we live in, but as central to it. Words are collective products of social interaction, essential instruments through which human beings constitute and articulate their world. The 20th view of language influenced development throughout the whole range of human sciences particularly in linguistics, philosophy, psychology, sociology, and anthropology.”

Benjamin Lee Whorf
Ø  Contributed his ideas about linguistic relativity, the hypothesis that language influences thought.
         (Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis)
                - is the idea that differences in the way languages encode cultural and cognitive categories affect the way people think.

Edward Sapir
Ø  Major Contribution


       Classification of indigenous languages of the Americas
       Develop the modern concept of the phoneme in phonology



Noam Chomsky
Ø  Compared his initial formulation of generative grammar with his structuralist predecessor's approach to syntax and then compared that formulation to the current perspective.
In the intervening six decades, Chomsky:
a)     Constructed a formal theory of grammar and explored its foundations
b)     Developed a cognitive/ epistemological interpretation of the theory, leading to the biolinguistic perspective
c)     Contributed major proposals for constraints on grammars resulting in a significant reduction in and simplification of the formal grammatical machinery; and
d)     Re-evaluated the theory of grammar in terms of language design, raising the possibility of empirical proposals about the language faculty as a biological entity with properties of economy, simplicity and efficient computation





Walang komento:

Mag-post ng isang Komento